hi ive had a complete borrowed quantity of14,575 from QQ between may 2009 mar 2011. over this duration we paid back a total of3148 in interest over this era. We have all my statements from QQ everything that is stating had compensated. Will quick quid spend me personally straight straight straight right back for the loans which are over 6 yrs old or have actually no chance was got by me of seeing the older loans refunded?
be therefore grateful for the assistance? if anybody has any previous experience on loans over 6 yrs old.
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
Hi Brad, the Financial Ombudsman solution is wanting to choose whether or not to view loans over 6 yrs . old and these situations are on hold until it will. You ought to get your plaint into QQ asap and get it to then the FOS after 8 days precisely – then if the FOS decides it can’t glance at the older loans, you are going to nevertheless have up to feasible within time.
many many thanks Sara. We went along to qq in the 23/8/16 so its just been a couple of weeks thus far. must I get directly to the ombudsman now or watch for their 8 week reaction. im worried im gonna lose out on the1000s before the 6 mark year. Perhaps you have been aware of the ombudsman having to pay on loans over the age of 6 years or they simply frozen until they determine what to accomplish?
appreciat your assistance. many many many thanks, Brad
additionally we nevertheless have1200 outstanding I owe with them which
My plaint with QQ got passed away to an adjudicator whom ntacted me personally regarding the 7th of September requesting my bank statements, credit report and if I experienced ever told QQ I happened to be in monetary trouble. They provided me with a due date to respond with all the details by 14th September. Have you any idea when they place the same due dates to QQ and, if that’s the case, does which means that that if QQ drag it out it’ll wait my instance much more?
Additionally, does anybody have idea that is rough of long it requires for the adjudicator in order to make a choice? It is now almost a few months since We first plained to QQ therefore it’s actually needs to drag down 🙁
Quick Quid get back once again to Adjudicator suggesting they don’t have actually to inquire about nsumer for spending ahead of 2014. and they’ll perhaps perhaps perhaps not refund such a thing. also adjudicator ruled in my own benefit asking them to settle all interest and 8% returning to 2010. simply interest es to over 10K. perhaps maybe maybe maybe not certain that this will be among the techniques utilized by Quick quid to drag it much much much longer.
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
“don’t have actually to inquire of for spending prior to 2014” this argument is comparable to a lender that is Virginia payday loans payday they didn’t need certainly to credit check you before 2014 that we composed this informative article about: s:debtcamel../payday-loan-credit-sres/. It really is theoretically true BUT in the event that you ntinued to borrow from their website thirty days after thirty days (which for you personally seems as if it had been for a long time) then QQ must have taken acunt of the, pointed out that you had been influenced by these loans and stopped lending. Or of urse they uld have expected you to definitely offer information about your ine and spending because they don’t have to do something doesn’t mean they uldn’t do it and this would have been something a responsible lender should have nsidered if they were worried – just.
A lender has got to simply just simply take acunt of whatever they knew. Should they didn’t understand your spending, they uldn’t just take acunt of this nevertheless they did realize that you’re over and over borrowing from their website suggesting the loans had been unaffordable. And additionally they ignored this.
It appears as if this will be a extremely good instance to decide to try the Ombudsman.
Many Thanks Sara, i shall wait till reaction from adjudicator as she’ll need to have a look at point raised by fast quid then inform me her reaction. I really hope adjudicator don’t alter her initial choice and stuck to her initial report. I will be concerned given that she may alter her initial choice.
Sara (Financial Obligation Camel) says
If she does (and ideally she won’t as this isn’t actually a significant argument from QQ) then e straight back right here as (a) it is possible to talk about it because of the adjudicator and (b) escalate to the Ombudsman degree if required.